Victimology and Alternatives to Traditional Criminal Justice essays

Victimology and Alternatives to Traditional Criminal Justice essays Alternatives to criminal justice system have been the growing part of the debate surrounding the theory of criminology. Shaming: In this arena of alternatives to criminal justice system, the most distinctive contribution has been John Braithwaites theory of regenerative shaming which conjectures the efficacy of re-integrative shaming and the counter-productiveness of stigmatization in controlling crime. John Braithwaite has asserted persuasively that the twin informal controls dissuading most people from offending against their fellow brethren are what he termed social disapproval and pangs of conscience. (Moore, n. d.) The formal criminal justice system in practice in the present modern era is all built upon a model of the state intervening so as to remedy the behavior of reasonable and rational individuals who have made choices that are socially undesirable. Shaming, under the theory of regenerative shaming, on the other hand, stresses upon the interdependency of individuals. It recognizes shame as an emotion which helps in regulating this interdependency. (Moore, n. d.) It is important to appreciate that a society marked by properly regulated interdependency, by the application of correct practices relating to shaming, the quantum of unlawful anti-social activities, i.e. the level of crime must be less. The hypothetical issue of modern criminology, its poor focus on social interdependency, therefore shows an intense issue in the Western approach towards punishment and crime. The basic issue has been that a methodical uncoupling relating to punishment and that of public shaming has been witnessed. In identifying shame as the emotion that controls the attachment between interdependent individuals Braithwaite as well as other theorists who are pioneers in the role of shame are proposing that realistic, effective programs are present. These programs should ...

Dangerous jargon - Emphasis

Dangerous jargon Dangerous jargon Jargon can bring clarity for experts and irritation for laypeople, but could it sometimes be life threatening? Yes, according to the coroner heading up the inquest into the London terrorist attacks of 7 July 2005, Lady Justice Hallett. Simple impatience with unclear terms is a more serious problem when it comes to understanding the situation at the scene of an emergency, she asserted on the last day of evidence-giving at the 7/7 hearing. Is it really worth the time it takes to refer to a conference demountable unit from a management centre, rather than a portable incident room, for example? And obscure job titles could confuse and disguise peoples roles, she pointed out. I dont know whether a crew manager is somebody who is responsible for supplies or is used to fighting fires. I have no idea, she said. Jargon has a long history of naysayers, but Lady Justice Halletts criticism touched on the most fundamental practicality of appropriate language. This isnt just somebody being pedantic about the use of English when it comes to managing incidents, people dont understand what the other person is.